Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
D(t) → 1
D(constant) → 0
D(+(x, y)) → +(D(x), D(y))
D(*(x, y)) → +(*(y, D(x)), *(x, D(y)))
D(-(x, y)) → -(D(x), D(y))
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
D(t) → 1
D(constant) → 0
D(+(x, y)) → +(D(x), D(y))
D(*(x, y)) → +(*(y, D(x)), *(x, D(y)))
D(-(x, y)) → -(D(x), D(y))
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:
[D1, 1, -2] > 0
[D1, 1, -2] > [+2, *2]
Status: +2: [2,1]
t: multiset
1: multiset
D1: [1]
-2: [2,1]
0: multiset
constant: multiset
*2: [2,1]